Axel Pond / Noosaga / product design / frontend engineering

Designing interfaces that teach.

I design and build tools for navigating complex subjects. Noosaga is the flagship: a visual atlas for seeing how fields connect, split, and evolve. This site shows more of the product thinking and interface work behind it.

Discipline Product interfaces
Discipline Information architecture
Discipline Frontend craft

Live system

Flagship product
Knowledge atlas Field to framework to concept
1,500+ fields mapped
18 top-level categories
4 core reasoning views

Working rule

Orient the user before trying to impress them.

What ships

  • Atlas routes from category to field to subfield
  • Compare views for schools, frameworks, and debates
  • Concept maps, timelines, guides, and reading paths
  • Source labels, confidence states, and AI-assisted workflows
Portrait of Axel Pond

Axel Pond

I design and build tools for navigating complex subjects.

information architecture interaction design frontend systems knowledge mapping provenance and trust complex subjects

Why This Site Exists

The product site stays restrained. This site shows more of the reasoning behind the work.

Noosaga keeps the atlas in front. Here I can show more of the decisions behind it.

Interactive Proof

Try the product argument instead of reading about it.

Each mode answers a different question. The point is better orientation, not more features.

Test the claim

Each view should help answer a different question.

Switch modes to see how the same field becomes easier to browse, compare, trace, and trust. This is a working proof, not a screenshot gallery.

Macroeconomics / overview / field spine

Start with the shape of the field, not a random result.

Orientation

The first screen should show what the field covers, which schools matter, and where to go next.

Field spine Route clarity Low-friction overview

Question unlocked

What are the main schools in this field, and where should I go next?

Macroeconomics
Schools
Timelines
Concepts
Guides
Debates

Interface decision

Lead with a field map, clear routes, and one obvious branch into frameworks, concepts, or guides.

User outcome

Users get bearings early instead of committing too soon to one book or article.

Engineering implication

One shared structure has to drive every view so the hierarchy survives across cards, filters, and routes.

1 entry screen
4 next steps
0 context lost

The point is not density. It is to make the field legible early.

Method

The work sits where research, design, and implementation shape each other.

I studied mathematics and NLP, and I keep coming back to the same problem: how interfaces change what people notice. That is why the work often starts with a model and ends in code.

01

Model the field

Start with what the user cannot yet see: categories, rival schools, concept clusters, or source lines.

02

Choose the right view

Different questions need different views: overview, comparison, maps, and guides.

03

Build the interface behavior

Hierarchy, motion, responsiveness, and state should help users stay oriented.

04

Make trust visible

If AI helps shape the content, the interface has to show what is sourced, inferred, and still uncertain.

Flagship Product

Noosaga is a good flagship because the hard parts are structural.

It forces taxonomy, views, trust cues, and frontend behavior to work as one product.

Why it matters

One product, four hard problems, one interface.

Noosaga only works if the content model, views, trust cues, and visual layer support the same outcome.

Read the case study

Architecture

Taxonomy that stays legible

Fields, subfields, schools, and concepts need a hierarchy that stays clear across every surface.

Interaction

Different views for different questions

Timelines, framework comparisons, concept maps, and guides each teach the user something different.

Trust

Provenance has to survive the pipeline

If AI helps generate structure, the interface has to expose what is sourced, inferred, and still uncertain.

Build

Frontend craft is part of the argument

Hierarchy, motion, responsiveness, and state transitions all need to make orientation easier instead of noisier.

Continue

Continue into the product, the case study, or the lab.

Connect

If the work is relevant, start with the product.

That is the clearest entry point. The case study, lab, writing, and code show how it is made.